Great Lakes Cities Challenge Waukesha's Plan to Tap Lake Michigan; Waukesha Dismisses Arguments
The decision to allow Waukesha to divert Lake Michigan water does meet the rigorous standards of the Great Lakes Compact and therefore sets 'a very bad precedent,' according to the Cities Initiative. It is launching a legal challenge, in addition to asking President Obama, Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau and the International Joint Commission to stop the diversion.
The Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Cities Initiativeis a coalition of 120 cities in the U.S. and Canada that border the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River basin. The cities have a combined population of 17 million people.
Initiative Vice Chair, Mayor Paul Dyster of Niagara Falls, NY says the decision to let Waukesha tap Lake Michigan water "opens the door to every neighboring city and county to the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Basin in the U.S. and Canada to get water from the basin without meeting the conditions of the Compact."
Compact members, earlier this summer, approved Waukesha's application to pump in water via Oak Creek's utility, use the water, treat it and return it using the Root River, but members reduced the amount Waukesha wanted from 10 to eight million gallons a day and restricted the area it could serve.
Waukesha and Wisconsin state leaders praised the Compact decision, saying the community met all of the demands.
Leaders of the Cities Initiative insisted throughout the process that Waukesha did not adequately explore other sources of drinking water, the impact of return flow on the Root River and future service areas that extend beyond the city of Waukesha.
Initiative mayors also expressed displeasure that the only system-wide public hearing on the issue was conducted in Waukesha, not in any communities that border the Great Lakes, and that there was no opportunity for public comment when Compact leaders detected deficiencies in Waukesha's application.
In response to Monday's announcement of a legal challenge, Waukesha Mayor Shawn Reilly says there is no new information which would demand reconsideration. "The claims by the cities group were thoroughly reviewed during that rigorous approval process," Reilly wrote. He says his city's application faced six years of scientific and legal review, including by the states and provinces that wrote the Compact.
According to Reilly, "Waukesha will not harm the Great lakes. We will borrow less than 1/1,000,000th of 1% of Great Lakes water. We will return approximately 100% of the volume of water that we withdraw...our return flow water is actually cleaner than the water in the Root River."
Waukesha needs a new source of drinking water because its underground supply is dwindling and increasingly concentrated with cancer-causing radium.
The city can apply for a diversion even though it's not located in the Great Lakes basin, because it is situation in Waukesha County - which straddles the basin. The city of Waukesha is located in the Mississippi River basin, so its natural water flow is to the west.